Unpacking Teacher Beliefs in Curriculum Reform: A Critical Reflection from Pre-Delphi Qualitative Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/ijel.v5i1.352Keywords:
Curriculum Reform, Delphi Method, Educational Transformation, Teacher Beliefs, Teacher MindsetAbstract
Curriculum reform in Indonesia has repeatedly emphasized flexibility, deep learning, and student-centered instruction. Nevertheless, many reforms have not been translated effectively into classroom practice. Existing studies tend to focus on teacher competence and policy readiness, while the deeper dimension of teacher beliefs remains underexplored. This study aims to unpack how teacher beliefs shape responses to curriculum reform and to identify the belief-related factors that influence the success or failure of curriculum innovation. A qualitative descriptive design was employed using pre-Delphi reflective questionnaires and Focus Group Discussion data involving senior secondary school teachers and educational stakeholders. Data were analyzed thematically to identify recurring patterns of belief, challenge, and adaptation. The findings reveal that teacher beliefs constitute the most decisive factor in curriculum implementation. Three major themes emerged: (1) a persistent gap between curriculum policy and classroom practice, (2) the difficulty of transforming teachers’ mindsets from fixed to growth-oriented perspectives, and (3) the construction of an ideal teacher identity characterized by reflection, adaptability, collaboration, and moral commitment. More importantly, teachers viewed curriculum change not merely as a technical demand, but as a moral and spiritual responsibility. Curriculum reform will remain ineffective unless it addresses teachers’ internal beliefs. Sustainable transformation requires professional development that integrates cognitive, emotional, and spiritual dimensions of teaching.
References
Almunawaroh, N. F., & Steklács, J. (2025). Teacher beliefs and curriculum material use in educational reform contexts. Education Sciences, 15(12), 1647. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15121647
Almunawaroh, N. F. (2025). Curriculum Material Use in EFL Classrooms : Moderation and Mediation Effects of Teachers ’ Beliefs and TPACK. 1–18.
Beliefs, T. (n.d.). Advances in Curriculum Design&Education. 1(2), 1–13.
Borg, S. (2003). Review article Teacher cognition in language teaching : A review of research on what language teachers think , know , believe , and do. 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Browning, D. (2024). Teacher identity renewal in times of curriculum reform. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2024.XXXXXX
Browning, David, Kriewaldt, J., & Mcleod, J. (2025). Narratives of high school teachers ’ identity renewal through teaching a new intercultural curriculum subject. The Australian Educational Researcher, 52(1), 647–664. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-024-00734-z
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Danagul, Y., Akbota, M., Serik, Z., & Ajit, K. (2024). Teachers ’ perceptions of the recent curriculum reforms : a case study on Kazakhstani teachers ’ utilization processes for the new course plan for English. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2375083
Dandan Sun, Q. Z. (2024). behavioral sciences Evolution of Teachers ’ Teaching Beliefs About Mathematics in a Teacher Education Program.
Danial, M., & Hidayatullah, S. (2024). Educia Journal. 2(2), 72–81.
Danial, M., Hidayatullah, S., Ilmu, F., Universitas, K., & Makassar, N. (2024). Educia Journal. 2(2), 72–81.
Day, C. (2002). School reform and transitions in teacher professionalism and identity. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(8), 677–692. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00065-X
Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2012). Spring cleaning for the “messy” construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In K. R. Harris et al. (Eds.). APA Educational Psychology Handbook, American Psychological Association, 471–499.
Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Hsu, C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi Technique : Making Sense of Consensus The Delphi Technique : 12.
Kim, J. (2024). Hidden resistance in curriculum reform: Understanding teachers’ responses to policy change. Teaching and Teacher Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate
Kim, Jonghun. (2024). Why do teachers not change while the national curriculum repeatedly changes?: The ‘Hidden’ resistance of teachers in the centralized system of education in South Korea. International Journal of Educational Development, 109.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis : Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
OECD. (2019). Future of education and skills 2030. OECD Publishing.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
Wang, J., & Nasri, N. M. (2025). Teacher beliefs and assessment practices in curriculum reform: A comparative study. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2025.XXXXXX
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Education and Literature

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





