Toxic Professional Relationship in Academic Settings: A Personal Reflection and Pedagogical Implication

Delfia Herwanis; Khairun Nasir; Maulida Maulida

doi:10.55606/ijel.v4i2.241

Authors

Delfia Herwanis Institut Agama Islam Negeri Takengon
Khairun Nasir Institut Agama Islam Negeri Takengon
Maulida Maulida Institut Agama Islam Negeri Takengon

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55606/ijel.v4i2.241

Keywords:

toxic workplace, academic culture, reflective practice, emotional labor, pedagogical resilience

Abstract

Toxic professional relationships—characterized by subtle exclusion, politicized decision-making, and emotional suppression—are a prevalent yet underexamined concern in academic institutions. This research emphasizes the psychological, pedagogical, and emotional repercussions for educators in situations characterized by workplace conflict, in contrast to prior studies that primarily examine structural factors. The study seeks to examine how educators perceive, interpret, and react to toxic dynamics, especially via reflective processes. We gathered data from three years of anonymized reflective journaling employing a qualitative, narrative-reflective methodology and conducted a theme analysis. Research highlights three main themes: the emotional effort needed to maintain professionalism despite feeling excluded, changes in teaching methods as a way to resist and find meaning, and how reflective practice helps teachers stay true to their teaching values. The analysis further demonstrates how gender and early-career status exacerbate susceptibility to toxic dynamics. The study prioritizes ethical contemplation as a transforming practice and a means of action instead of providing prescriptive solutions. Institutions should implement emotional intelligence training, equitable task allocation, and peer support mechanisms to cultivate more equal academic settings. This research advocates for a work culture founded on explicit performance expectations, mutual respect, compassion, and integrity in education, facilitating a deeper comprehension of teachers' authentic experiences in challenging school environments.

References

[1] Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included: Racism and diversity in institutional life. Duke University Press.

[2] Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002

[3] Bellas, M. L. (1999). Emotional labor in academia: The case of professors. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 561, 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716291561001009

[4] Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

[5] Brookfield, S. D. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. Jossey-Bass.

[6] Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.

[7] Darabi, A., Mokari-Yamchi, Z., Hajizadehoghaz, M., & Rezazadeh. (2019). Diets and irritable bowel syndrome. Journal of Nutrition Fasting and Health, 7(3), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.22038/jnfh.2019.37551.1165

[8] Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. (Eds.). (2010). Bullying and harassment in the workplace. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/EBK1439804896

[9] Einarsen, S. V., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (2020). The concept of bullying and harassment at work. In S. V. Einarsen et al. (Eds.), Bullying and harassment in the workplace (pp. 3–53). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429462528-2

[10] Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-12.1.1589

[11] Fleming, P. (2021). Dark academia: How universities die. Pluto Press.

[12] Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California Press.

[13] Hollis, L. P. (2015). Bullied out of position and into retirement: One woman’s story of workplace bullying. WestBow Press.

[14] Keashly, L., & Neuman, J. H. (2010). Faculty experiences with bullying in higher education. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32(1), 48–70. https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806320103

[15] Kezar, A. (2002). Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st century: Recent research and conceptualizations. Jossey-Bass.

[16] Lester, J. (2013). Gendered perspectives on faculty leadership: A study of department chairs. Innovative Higher Education, 38(5), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9256-3

[17] Lester, J. (2013). Gendered perspectives on faculty work and leadership: Navigating the labyrinth. Journal of the Professoriate, 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-012-9256-3

[18] Morley, L. (2013). The rules of the game: Women and the leaderist turn in higher education. Gender and Education, 25(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2012.740888

[19] Palmer, J. A. (1998). Environmental education in the 21st century: Theory, practice, progress and promise. Routledge.

[20] Salin, D. (2003). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56(10), 1213–1232. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267035610003

[21] Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Temple Smith.

[22] Schön, D. A. (2017). The reflective practitioner (Reprint). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473

[23] Susanti, H. D. (2020). Application of material requirement planning method in raw materials planning on sardine product in PT. Blambangan Foodpackers Indonesia. Food Research, 4(6), 2067–2072. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.4(6).228

[24] Zembylas, M. (2005). Discursive practices, genealogies, and emotional rules: A poststructuralist view on emotion and identity in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(8), 935–948.